Defendant in Terror Case Gets Lawyer of His Choice

 A lawyer who is under federal indictment in Syracuse and under federal investigation in Manhattan will be able to represent a high-profile defendant in a terrorism case, a judge ruled on Tuesday.



The defendant, Sulaiman Abu Ghaith, is Osama bin Laden’s son-in-law, and when he was first arraigned in Manhattan in March, on a charge of conspiring to kill Americans, the federal public defender’s office was appointed to represent him.
But he later told the judge that he wanted to retain a private lawyer, Stanley L. Cohen.
Federal prosecutors in Manhattan recently wrote to the judge, Lewis A. Kaplan of Federal District Court, citing the potential ethical conflicts that such a decision could pose. They noted that Mr. Cohen is charged in Syracuse with obstructing the Internal Revenue Service and that their own office was conducting a “criminal tax investigation” of Mr. Cohen.
In court, the judge took Mr. Abu Ghaith through a series of questions to make sure he understood those potential conflicts and risks. For example, he noted, Mr. Cohen might conduct his defense in a way that might lead prosecutors in his own case to go easy on him. Mr. Abu Ghaith said that he understood the issues, and still wanted Mr. Cohen as his lawyer.
In his order, Judge Kaplan said he had found “that potential conflicts” of retaining Mr. Cohen “have been knowingly and voluntarily waived,” and he was relieving the public defenders. That office, as well as prosecutors, declined to comment.
Mr. Cohen said: “A large population in the world does not believe that in this day and age Abu Ghaith can ever receive justice in a courtroom in New York City. Granting his request to proceed to trial with counsel of his choice is the first step.”