The Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers (ATSA) has
recently selected an article by California Sex Crimes Defense Lawyer
Karen L. Goldstein to be published in its quarterly publication, the
Forum. In her Los Angeles-based sex crimes defense firm, Goldstein
defends clients accused of state and federal sex offenses throughout
California with a focus on child pornography crimes in the federal
arena. Her article "The Uncertain Future of Federal Child Pornography Sentencing" was published in the spring 2013 edition of the Forum.
ATSA is
a multi-disciplinary organization dedicated to understanding the
reasons that sexual abuse occurs and how sexual abuse and sex crimes can
be prevented. It is made up of physicians, academic researchers, and
other concerned professionals. They publish research, promote education
and encourage dialogue between professionals and the general public.
They also advocate a variety of causes and work on public policy and
community strategies that lead to the effective assessment and treatment
of individuals who have sexually abused or are at risk to abuse.
The organization was founded and is based in Oregon and has been
organizing conferences and publishing research since 1984. It has
members from around the world and is committed to reducing the number of
sex crimes internationally with a particular focus on the United
States. The ATSA Forum often features articles from people in relevant
professions but also features writers, such as attorneys, who are from
outside the treatment community, but work in an interrelated discipline.
Part of the goal is to allow dialogue across disciplines and
professional fields.
In her article, Goldstein discusses some of the new findings
contained in the 2012 U.S. Sentencing Commission’s Report to Congress on
Federal Child Pornography Offenses. Much of the article features her
analysis of the potential implications of this report for federal
judges, federal defendants and criminal defense attorneys representing
clients accused of federal child pornography crimes. She discusses a few
of the most problematic aspects of the federal sentencing guidelines
with respect to child pornography offenses, including the routine
application of enhancements to a defendant's sentence and the inability
of the guidelines to account for a defendant’s true culpability. She
concludes by expressing both skepticism and optimism for the future of
child pornography sentencing and highlights the fact that more
meaningful, modern, and nuanced reform is necessary in order to arrive
at more just federal sentences in this arena.
In regard to enhancements, Goldstein writes that someone convicted of
possessing child pornography on a computer faces a significant
enhancement to their sentence. Instead of acting like an enhancement,
however, the additional penalties become automatic since, as reported by
the U.S, Sentencing Commission data "100% of all child pornography
possession offenses involved the use of a computer. Despite this
statistical fact—that the use of a computer has literally become
synonymous with the commission of a child pornography offense—the use of
a computer still increases a defendant’s potential sentence by 1.5
years or more depending on the initial base offense level." Making these
sentence enhancements nearly automatic defeats the purpose of having
enhancements, Goldstein contends.
Another problematic enhancement involves the downloading of more than
600 illegal images which leads to a nearly automatic and catastrophic
sentence. Goldstein argues that "Thousands of images can be downloaded
with the click of a button, in a matter of minutes, even if the user
only intended to download a few specific images." Having more than 600
images of child pornography can lead to an extended sentence of up to
four years. In such an instance, downloading so many images is almost
automatic; this makes the enhancement almost automatic as well. These
unjust sentences are just a few of the many problems that the Commission
reports upon. Goldstein's article delves into many of the Commission's
findings and commends aspects of their work and analysis even when she
laments whether or not the sentencing guidelines will be amended.
A federal criminal defense lawyer's perspective on the Commission's
report may have been particularly attractive to the editors of the ATSA
Forum since Goldstein has defended innumerable clients who have faced
what she sees as draconian and out-dated sentences. Instead of brutal
penalties, the vast majority of ATSA members see understanding, empathy,
treatment and dialogue as far more effective strategies for reducing
the number of sex crimes. Many clinicians and defense attorneys argue
that unreasonable and unjust sentences do nothing to enhance public
safety or address the underlying issues that may lead a perpetrator to
engage in sexual abuse. Furthermore, many of the sentencing guidelines
make all people who possess child pornography equally culpable despite
details of their individual circumstances.
Though they have differing foci and work in different fields,
Goldstein and the medical and counseling professionals at ATSA seem to
be in agreement with one another regarding the need for compassionate,
nuanced, and more thoughtful work on federal criminal cases involving
child pornography offenses.